 |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ostrich

Joined: 30 Mar 2006 Posts: 4960 Location: Nebraska
|
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 9:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm actually surprised the allergy business isn't starting to boom. I mean, the GF business alone is $1.7 billion. Add all the un-Dx-ed people (good point Steph) and everybody who's allergic to nuts/eggs/soy/etc, and you're talking billions upon billions of dollars. _________________ Ostrich :>--O==={
Time falls away, but these small hours
These little wonders still remain |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cruelshoes

Joined: 23 Sep 2005 Posts: 3380 Location: Washington State
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
The burning question on my mind is this: Does the law require that food be TESTED to carry a GF label? In my reading of the law, I don't think this is required. From what I can tell, it is only required that the ingredients in the product are GF.
I'm not sure where I am going with this question, only trying to get clarity on what the law really means. My mind is going down the rabbit hole of shared lines, ingredients contaminated in growing/pricessing, etc.
Any info? _________________ -Colleen
Where are we going, and what am I doing in this handcart? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
forums.glutenfree.com is graciously sponsored by:

Home
© 2008 glutenfree.com
Powered by phpBB
© 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|